Amal
Osman
English
1109.01AT8:15Am
Mike
Lohre
October
1, 2013
Journal Seven
At
the end of the book kozol goes in more depth about himself and his parents. He
states a lot about his dad’s life, he shares that dad followed his dreams even
though his parents never agreed with him. He tells us, how his father went to
the Harvard Law School because his mother wanted Kozol’s dad to follow in the
same footsteps his brother did. “Only after traveling to Europe on a fellowship
one summer to investigate the work of specialists in schizophrenic and meeting
a man who coined the term, the great physician Eugene Blueler, at his home in
Switzerland and later taking with the elderly physician and psychologist Pierre
Janet at the Salpêtrière in Paris, did he make up his mind to give up Law
school and go back to Harvard College for two difficult semesters of organic
chemistry, biology, and German (Kozol 287). He also talked about how he wished
the children of St. Ann’s would have the same dreams his father did and that
someday they hopefully will. Kozol has this goals that he expects from the
children and things that they can do the same things his father did and he also
heard many people tell him that it wasn’t possible because of the conditions
they were in. “it would be nice,’ they’ll say, “if all these children could go
to Europe someday, as your father did, and study with the great professors and
attend distinguished universities and someday lead exciting, richly cultivated
lives. Some of them might do it, four or five out of a hundred. The majority
will not.” To hold up dreams like that, they tell him me, more or less in words
like these, is “just not doing anyone a favor (Kozol 291). They state it clearly, that kozol needs to
face the reality and realize that there’s nothing he can do to change that.
Even if he did, he could only help one child out of the thousands.
At
the end chapter twenty-two Kozol questions is ok to let Pineapple continue with
her dream of becoming a pediatrician or a surgeon or warn her of the rode ahead
of her. He wonders about if he could help her by getting in contact with people
of influence. But then questions himself “Then where does that leave Ariel and
Elio and Stephanie? Why shouldn’t all these children have the opportunity as
well? (Kozol 295)” and then all the way at the end of the chapter he states
that “There should not a narrow gate for children of the poor, a wide and open
gate for children of the fortunate and favored. There should be one open gate. It
should be known to everyone. It should be wide enough so even Pineapple can get
in without squeezing. I really agree with that children should have open doors
so than their dreams would easily enter through.
When
Kozol Ordinary Resurrection he chose to write the book in third point of
view, I really respect and admire him for doing that. Because it made the book
more interesting and its very understandable. During Kozol’s personal story, he
chose to write in first person which I thought was powerful. It showed a lot of
emotions. What really influenced me
while read this book, was the determination and passion the children had toward
learning and sharing. Opening up to others was the biggest impact of the book,
the children overcame a lot of obstacles that was on their ways.
I agree with your point that the children must have open doors to different possibilities. In the book we see that many of them do not have these different opportunities.
ReplyDelete